07-28-2005 08:56 PM
I'm surprized by the scores you get with Vision assistant :
On my PC (Athlon 2.6 GHz, 512 ko RAM, W2000K) I find :
- Conveyor belt : 160 ms/image
- Conveyor belt 2 : 275 ms/image
Quite far from your scores ! May be instead of trying to improve the algorithm, you should try to improve the PC !
07-28-2005 09:37 PM
Hum, I made a "small" mistake. I made some confusion between scripts :
conveyor belt
07-28-2005 09:37 PM - edited 07-28-2005 09:37 PM
Hum, I made a "small" mistake. I made some confusion between scripts :
- conveyor belt 56 ms/image
- conveyor belt 2 160 ms/image
Any comment ?
Message Edited by chilly charly on 07-29-2005 04:38 AM
07-29-2005 10:28 AM
07-29-2005 08:51 PM - edited 07-29-2005 08:51 PM
Of course, playing with better contrasted images is a pleasure. I have attached 2 new scripts.
Conveyor belt High contrast should be close to optimal for shape, and is slightly faster than the previous script. I used manual thresholding, but in case of variable light level, it could be necessary to use an automatic thresholding procedure, searching for a minimum in the grey level histogram, between the object and the background.
Conveyor belt High contrast High speed does the job in less than 2 ms/image !
Of course some compromise could be found between these two extremes solutions.
I also think that with such well contrasted images, the direct pattern matching could work without preprocessing.
Message Edited by chilly charly on 07-30-2005 03:52 AM