10-05-2019 08:04 AM
Hi everyone,
I am planning a research study and wanting to use the exercise bike below to measure changes in performance due to an intervention and fatige over time.
The bike has a single 3.5mm mono audio connector that attaches to the LCD on the top of the bike that displays all sorts of data, such as power (W), cadence (rpm), distance (m), etc... I have recorded the signal in labview and it appears to be a continuous waveform with the peak and valley of the signal matching with lever arm end points (with reference to the left lever arm: when moving forward the signal amplitude increases positively over time; when moving backward the signal amplitude decreases over time)... There are no puluses or spikes, just a type of sine wave that increases in frequency as the lever arms move faster..
Based on this, would it be safe to say the signal is being generated from a position sensor in the flywheel? Not a rotorary encoder? Is it possble to tell the difference based on signal characteristics?
Also, I would like to get a direct measurement of force production... I am thinking of adding a tension/compression strain guage to the connector rod at the bottom of the bike between the lever arms and pedals... Any suggestions for what to use for this? Are "bolt on" strain guages any good?
Any feedback or comments appreciated...
Many thanks.
Jack
10-15-2019 07:39 AM
Based on this, would it be safe to say the signal is being generated from a position sensor in the flywheel? Not a rotorary encoder? Is it possble to tell the difference based on signal characteristics?
Whether it's specifically a position sensor, I don't know, but it's definitely not a digital encoder given that the signal is not a pulse train.
Also, I would like to get a direct measurement of force production... I am thinking of adding a tension/compression strain guage to the connector rod at the bottom of the bike between the lever arms and pedals... Any suggestions for what to use for this? Are "bolt on" strain guages any good?
In what direction do you want to capture force? Always in the downward direction, or always orthogonal to the lever? If you put a bending sensor (strain gage) on the connector rod, then which force orientation you'd capture would depend on whether the connector rod is rigidly connected to the pedal or to the lever.
Either way, I've never used a bolt-on strain gage, so no comment there. I almost wonder if there were a low-profile sensor with a large surface area that would sit between the pedal and the biker's shoe so you could get the force even more directly, but this would only be helpful if capturing force in the downward direction. If you wanted to capture force orthogonal to the lever, I'd be more inclined to use a torque sensor on the central shaft and then back-calculate force using the length of the lever. This seems simpler than trying to get a gage properly mounted in the right geometry on the tiny connector rod, though it would be even less direct a measurement. I'm definitely not an expert on mounting sensors, so take these comments with a pinch of salt.