10-30-2025 09:22 PM
Hi, we use the SCC-AI03 module in a SC-2345 box to measure the voltage signal (1 to 9 VDC) from a pressure transducer. We plan to replace the old setup with a USB-6001. We only need to record the pressure from two transducers. We found the signal from USB-6001 has higher noise than the old SC-2345/SCC-AI03.
We use LabView to run the measurement. The setting is as follow:
-- Terminal configuration: RSE
-- Timing settings: Model N samples, Samples to read 100, Rate (Hz) 1K
The SCC-AI03 has f0=10kHz. How can we improve the performance of the USB-6001 measurement? Thanks a lot.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-31-2025 12:48 AM
Please share data on the noise you captured.
Note that 6001 is an entry-level DAQ and not comparable to high-end X-series DAQ performance.
What DAQ were you previously using with the signal conditioning box?
10-31-2025 11:59 AM
Hi santo_13,
The DAQ currently used is 6036E. I attached signal collected by USB-6001 and 6036E. The timing is set as 100 samples and 1kHz. We measured for 1 minute and get 600 data points.
We tried the USB-6001 is because we have one available. Our budget is a little tight for this project. Do you think a USB-6003 or USB-6421 can reduce the noise?
We use the single-ended connection on USB-6001. Do you think the differential can reduce the noise?
Do you think a grounded enclosure help to reduce the noise?
10-31-2025 09:27 PM
it depends on what kind of noise you're dealing with
please read Field Wiring and Noise Considerations for Analog Signals - NI
11-03-2025 11:31 AM
Hi Santo_13,
Thank you very much. I am sharing the information with colleagues. We are trying to reduce the noise of this DAQ setup following the instruction, and will use it as a guideline for the other projects.