10-31-2006 09:06 AM
10-31-2006 10:47 AM
How important is the stepper's velocity profile to your measurement? A 6220 board by itself can easily configured to use a counter output as its AI sampling clock, helping to sync your analog measurement to your step command. As for generating the step pulse sequence, that'll depend on your needs. Here's what you can expect with the 6220 alone:
1. Can generate fixed # of steps at constant rate. Both counters work together to generate finite pulse train.
2. Can generate "continuous" pulse train whose freq can be changed on-the-fly. Will be difficult to accurately control total # steps generated, but can count them with other counter. Freq changes through software calls, so can not count on smooth ramping.
3. Can use "correlated DIO" to generate a more precisely-defined trajectory using a hw-timed digital output. Will take just a little more work and/or wiring to get this in sync with analog input.
-Kevin P.
11-01-2006 05:44 AM
11-01-2006 01:54 PM
11-07-2006 03:36 AM
Abhinav,
I'm moving a motor forth and back and sample at the same time the analogue value of a force measuring device. At the end I need a force-distance diagramm.
Several hardware configurations can be possible:
1. Using simple a DAQmx-device which outputs steps and direction to a servo drive. The drive does the position control loop. The analogue input gets sampled by the counters internal output or by the encoder feedback attached to the motor.
2. Using a 7332/7342/7352 controller in combination with a M-series 6220 device. The advantage are ramps and stuff I can do with the motion controller. Via RTSI the motion controller sources the sample clock for the AI of the DAQmx device.
Since the servo drive excepts step and direction signals the 7332 should be good enough for the task. From NI I was suggested to use the 735x series. Is that really necessary? And, can I use only the meassured position (of an encoder feedback) as sample clock which goes via RTSI to the DAQmx-device? Can I also use the commanded position instead?
So long.
So long.
11-09-2006 09:12 AM