Multisim and Ultiboard

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

AC analysis issues

Solved!
Go to solution

I have created a CD4007UBE NMOS transistor using a virtual enhancement mode 4 terminal mosfet from Multisim. To test if the imported model was correct I've designed the circuit and compared the DC, transient, and AC analysis to simulations conducted in Mircrocap and PSpice (for the same circuit).

 

Everything is in the agreement except the AC analysis. The phase response is completely different from Mircorcap and PSpice...The midband gain is in the agreement with the other two softwares, however the low frequency and the high frequency response is way different in Multisim. 

 

I cannot figure out why this would be the case..... I am using bypass caps in my circuit and I shouldn't be seeing any DC gain...Multisim is showing a DC gain where there should be none. 

 

Any suggestions will do...I really would like to figure this issues out...

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 7
(5,632 Views)

Hi there,

 

This sounds funny. Can you post your test bench, SPICE model and expected results for us to take a look?

 

Also, are you using the correct MOSFET level?

 

Thanks.

----------
Yi
Software Developer
National Instruments - Electronics Workbench Group
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 7
(5,616 Views)

Thanks for the reply...


Yes, it is definitelly funny... I really hope that I've just made a silly mistake. 

 

Anyway, I have attached the circuit (vin has no DC offset so the gate is biased at 0 V), spice model used in Microcap and Multisim, and the expected AC analysis results from Microcap. 

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

 

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 7
(5,607 Views)
MOSFET Level 1 was used in Microcap so I am using Level 1 in Multisim too.
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 7
(5,605 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author addda
I have fixed the problem.
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 7
(5,578 Views)

Just out of curiosity, what was the root cause?

 

I simulated this is LTSpice which generated the same result as Multisim. PSpice 16.0 calculated the circuit to be in cut off. Was it a biasing issue?

 

----------
Yi
Software Developer
National Instruments - Electronics Workbench Group
0 Kudos
Message 6 of 7
(5,574 Views)

The circuit is biased properly...The reason I used this exact circuit was because I know it works, meaning the hardware performs as well as the design.

 

The issue was that I missed the vertical scale option in AC analysis simulation window. All I had to do is set that to Decibels and just plot v(vo)...this solved the problem.

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 7
(5,569 Views)