Multisim and Ultiboard

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Confused

Can someone explain why two exact circuit can have different results? Initially the first circuit got convergence error, and I workaround it by setting lower input freq and increase it on the fly. Still, the first and second circuit outputs are diffferent?

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 2
(4,799 Views)

myopenid,

 

I reviewed the circuits and there is a slight, but very important difference...

 

If you look carefully at the '2N5484' model, in "Non-Working" Circuit... (you'll see parameters CGS, CGD) - these are valid Capacitance Gate-Source, Capacitance Gate-Drain values...

J1 10 20 30 NJF
.MODEL NJF NJF
+             VTO = -1.2796E+000
+            BETA = 1.71347E-003
+          LAMBDA = 1.93292E-002
+              RD = 4.41873E+000
+              RS = 4.41873E+000
+              IS = 1.25479E-016
+            CGS = 2.25000E-012
+            CGD = 2.34000E-012
+              PB = 1.14141E+000
+              FC = 5.00000E-001



In the '2N5484' model of the "Working" Circuit... (you'll see CGS0, CGD0)

J1 10 20 30 NJF
.MODEL NJF NJF
+             VTO = -1.2796E+000
+            BETA = 1.71347E-003
+          LAMBDA = 1.93292E-002
+              RD = 4.41873E+000
+              RS = 4.41873E+000
+              IS = 1.25479E-016
+            CGSO = 2.25000E-012
+            CGDO = 2.34000E-012
+              PB = 1.14141E+000
+              FC = 5.00000E-001

 

 

However if you look at the Simulation tab, you'll find that parameters CGS0, CGD0 are invalid and not supported (which makes them 0 in the model, i.e. no capacitance).  

 

Basically looking at your operating frequency, you have a 1Ghz source, and with no G-S or G-D capacitance you can run the 'working' circuit at this frequency (no device capacitance), which is likely not realistic, but with the actual values for the '2N5484' in place of 2.25pF and 2.34pF respectively, basically the cascode amplifier will not work at this frequency...

 

- Regards,

Pat Noonan

National Instruments

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 2
(4,683 Views)