NI Package Management Idea Exchange

Community Browser
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NI Package Management Idea Exchange


Post your ideas that are related to NI package management. This includes NI Package Manager, NI Package Builder, creating NI packages (.nipkg), distributing NI packages (.nipkg), managing feeds, and more.

Post an idea

This probably applies more to building a NI Package via Application Builder, but would be helpful if you could do it with NI Package Builder (NIPB). It should be easier to call a VI(s) as a custom execute steps of a package. You can do this currently by making your VI follow the LabVIEW CLI pattern. However this does requiring a lot of manual entry from the user to do in NIPB, thus being error prone. Also to do with the Application Builder, you have to make a batch file and add that to project even thought the batch fill does not need to exist other than to do the install/uninstall.

It would be nice to be able to customize what is shown in the NIPM installation window while a Custom Execute is running. Frequently I am calling cmd.exe to run custom actions, so the executing cmd.exe is not very helpful as that is just means to calling something else with arguments. I would be helpful to be able to give a better description to the users of what was happening during that call. I would be ok if it was just an addition to what is shown now.

Cosmetic / Minor issue

 

I have a solution with one underscore character in its file name. It is properly displayed in the window title bar, but undescore is missing in most recently used files, under File menu.

 

NIPB_DisplayIssueInFileMenu.png

 

I made some complementary tests, with dummy solution files named Undescore_One.pbsUndescore_One_Two.pbs and Undescore_One_Two_Three.pbs. Only the first underscore in the file name is missing in menu display:

 

NIPB_DisplayIssueInFileMenu.png

 

I am using NI Package Builder 20.6.0.1227.

 

Regards, 

It would nice to have an option to add a file without Discovery to package. Currently they only way it place the file in a folder that the package will deploy which is a bit heavy handed for a single file. This would also give parity to folders that currently have both options. Another related idea, would be to be able to turn Discovery on/off for the inputs via the right-click menu.

You can add folders to the "inputs" in NIPB, and they will auto detect if files have been changed / added to the solution.

 

If you ad a folder (or a complex folder hierarchy) to a package, it disconnects ALL of the folders.  I completely understand why this might be done, but it creates a slightly unexpected disconnect between the "inputs" and the "package workspace"

 

If files are updated, those updates propagate between both locations -- Great!

 

If files are added, those updates propagate to the Inputs, but NOT the workspace.

 

This can be pretty frustrating, especially for deeply nested folder structures...

 

My request is not that this is entirely switched, but rather an option to add a linked folder to the workspace... My thought is that this would function much like the "autopopulating folders" from labVIEW (vs snapshots) -- Though it would be nice if the base added folder could have it's name changed and still maintain the link (though not required).