04-21-2008 09:51 AM
04-22-2008 02:02 AM
04-22-2008 08:08 AM - edited 04-22-2008 08:09 AM
04-22-2008 02:31 PM
04-22-2008 02:59 PM
04-22-2008 04:58 PM
04-22-2008 04:58 PM
04-23-2008 12:46 AM
Hi Kristen,
I dont think that will work, a change in the record result property will only become effective when you next execute the step. ie that step must return back to the sequence and moved to the next step. If you use an external loop rather than the Step Loop then it would work.
But then remember that if this step gets called again, the Step Record Result would be in the enabled state and therefore would have to be disabled before its called. Unless it an new execution, the Sequence / SequenceFile conatining the Step was unloaded after its execution.
Another option would be to use the PostResult callback and discard the result.
Regards
Ray Farmer
04-23-2008 02:13 AM
Hi Ray,
I think that the suggestion of Kirsten is working, if you are using custom step-looping.
I have rewritten my example (Looping enabled, ResultRecord and ...Seq.Failure enabled).
Just take a look on it.
To set it to "Failed", set: Locals.nRetryCount ==2 to Locals.nRetryCount ==4
Let's hope thats that what jholcomb is looking for
Greetings
juergen
04-23-2008 07:59 AM