threads dilemma

[kometuza]

Hello.

I have attached an example where there are one subsequence that runs in a new thread in parallel with 3 other sequences that runs sequentially.

Is it possible to stop Seq1 and still log the results that it has so far if seq2 or seq3 fails?

[kometuza]

I have attached an example where there are one subsequence that runs in a new thread in parallel with 3 other sequences that runs sequentially.

Is it possible to stop Seq1 and still log the results that it has so far if seq2 or seq3 fails?

[~jiggawax~]

Ultimately it would be fixed by placing the wait step correlating to Seq1 in the Cleanup step group.  However, it will work as is if you go to station options and uncheck the go to cleanup on failure box.

It will always show up out of order.

Regards,