Signal Conditioning

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Is there a way to reduce the audible relay noise on an SCXI-1122?

I've worked with LabView and 5B signal conditioning for years, but I'm very new to PXI/SCXI, and I'm having trouble getting my SCXI-1122 modules to work the way I thought they would.

Mainly, I'm wondering if there is any way to reduce the "thrip" sound that the relays in the 1122s make when scanning through a set of channels; the system is going to be part of a demonstration unit, and the person who purchased it didn't realize that the modules used mechanical relays.

On a related note, when scanning the channels on three SCXI-1122 modules connected to a PXI-6052E (via a PXI-1010 combo chassis), is there a way to have each SCXI module multiplex to a different channel on the DAQ card and run the three rea
ds in parallel (so the read will occur 3 times faster), or must they occur sequentially?

In retrospect, I don't believe the SCXI-1122 was the best choice for this application (it turns out we don't need its high voltage range), but I'm stuck with it now.
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(3,188 Views)
I do not hear any specific relay noise in my modules; however, the test lab has a noticeable background noise level (air handlers, HVAC). Can you scan the modules one at a time to determine if all of the relays are "loud"? Perhaps only one module needs to be exchanged. Only someone from NI could state whether the audible "thrip" is normal.

As for the "alternate scanning method", it would not work for several reasons. First, the 1010 combo chassis is setup for the last PXI slot to be the controller for the SCXI modules with the default to multi-plex all of the data through channel 0. You cannot address the SCXI modules on other 6052E channels (although you could use an 1180 feedthrough panel to access the other 6052E channels). In addition, you would not gain any scan
performance increase. For all three modules on channel 0 of the 6052E, the fastest (theoretical) scan rate would be (333kHz/48 channels) or 6.9 kHz. Scanning 16 channels on each of three channels (0,1,2) would not give any performance gains - and in fact, would actually be slower due to interchannel delays and the individual addressing and muxing of three separate modules at different times. In addition, parallel reads on the DAQ card would only cause buffer errors as the AI Config VI assigns the 6052E buffer to a unique Task ID. Parallel AI Reads on a single Task ID would cause buffer hardware errors due to simultaneous attempts to access hardware that is already in use.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(3,188 Views)
The audible "thrip" sound from the relays in the SCXI-1122 is normal, however it does "thrip" much more than it should. This is due to a known issue in the current NI-DAQ software.

Also, AVR is correct about scanning three SCXI-1122 modules on three separate channels.

Russell McMurtrey
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
http://www.ni.com/support
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(3,188 Views)