BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

End of Windows XP support


RobCole@Work wrote:

I know this is month out of date or so, but I read an interesting article today saying that Windows XP is getting more secure. The argument goes that as fewer people use it, it becomes less of a target for hackers. Much more productive to find a hole in a well-used OS.

 


With that logic Windows 3.11 for workgroups would be secure.  No idea if it is true or not.  Windows 98SE was a solid OS wonder how hard it would be to run that on a modern PC.  Windows 2000 would probably work easier.

0 Kudos
Message 21 of 36
(14,746 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:


With that logic Windows 3.11 for workgroups would be secure.  No idea if it is true or not.  Windows 98SE was a solid OS wonder how hard it would be to run that on a modern PC.  Windows 2000 would probably work easier.


No support for 64bit processors, hard drives over 137GB, USB flash drives or printers.  Limited to FAT32 filesystem, doubt many websites would load correctly(old Java, flash, etc), old style Microsoft support for various standards(read: they made their own buggy version, which worked when they had 95% market share).  3rd party drivers made some of that sorta work.  98SE was good for it's day but pretty useless now.


--Using LV8.2, 8.6, 2009, 2012--
0 Kudos
Message 22 of 36
(14,702 Views)

But will it run this? 😄

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 23 of 36
(14,696 Views)

98 was still DOS based, so maybe.  Little before my time.

 

I like NI's phone number from that era.  1-800-IEEE-488.


--Using LV8.2, 8.6, 2009, 2012--
Message 24 of 36
(14,691 Views)

I looke up that bridge point parkway address on google maps. It is literally at the end of the road. 😄

 

0 Kudos
Message 25 of 36
(14,683 Views)
That's still the number I use to call NI. It goes right to a person and then they redirect you.

Also the unofficial Widows 98 service pack would fix a lot of those feature issues. USB thumb ddrie, NTFS support and not sure why you would be limited to 137gb. And just use a 3rd party browser. Some old Mozilla probably runs ok.
0 Kudos
Message 26 of 36
(14,689 Views)

I still have LabView 5.1 and 6i both run fine on Windows 98

========================
=== Engineer Ambiguously ===
========================
0 Kudos
Message 27 of 36
(14,687 Views)

I found an old LabVIEW demo (3.1.1) and it won't run at all under Windows 7.

 

It still runs just fine under Windows XP mode. 😄 (Yes, I copied the files from the two floppies long ago).

 


 

 

 

Message 28 of 36
(14,681 Views)

It is basically a stripped down LabVIEW version that only allows the included demo programs. IT is LabVIEW 3.1.1

 

 

Message 29 of 36
(14,678 Views)

Here's what I get when I try to open my copy of LabVIEW 3.1.1. (Window 7)

 

 

My LabVIEW 4.0.1 copy seems to work just find though.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 30 of 36
(14,634 Views)