If you think the new Boolean constant design is too small...

[Darren]

...then do I have a Boolean constant for you!

Happy Friday, everybody.  🙂

P.S. - Yeah, I probably wouldn't put this guy in any important VIs...

[SteveChandler]

I have one question. How and.why? Ok make that two questions 🙂

[altenbach]

Alternatively you could simply set the resolution of your monitor to 640x480. 🙂

[smercurio_fc]

That looks like a company logo now. Darren, if I were you I'd copyright that image so when "Tiger Manufacturing" comes around for a logo and they want yours they'll have to pay you oodles of money so you can retire next to Larry Ellison.

Just a thought.

[Darren]

---

@Steve Chandler wrote:
I have one question. How and.why? Ok make that two questions 🙂

---

There's a sequence of steps you can follow that will cause a normal, mild-mannered Boolean constant to, um, get angry.

It's already CARed, and should be fixed in a future LabVIEW version.

[tst]

---

@Darren wrote:

There's a sequence of steps you can follow that will cause a normal, mild-mannered Boolean constant to, um, get angry.

---

I don't know about you, but I never found booleans to be very pleasant. There's no reasoning or middle ground with them. Everything is either-or. They're very unaccommodating and it's very rude.

[altenbach]

---

Darren wrote:

There's a sequence of steps you can follow that will cause a normal, mild-mannered Boolean constant to, um, get angry.

---

That clearly got lost in the first post. Since you are an NI insider, I simply figured you have a bottomless bag of tricks at your disposal and that size was intentional for some reason. 😄

[crossrulz]

---

@tst wrote:

---

@Darren wrote:

There's a sequence of steps you can follow that will cause a normal, mild-mannered Boolean constant to, um, get angry.

---

I don't know about you, but I never found booleans to be very pleasant. There's no reasoning or middle ground with them. Everything is either-or. They're very unaccommodating and it's very rude.

---

And it seems like they aren't using all of of their bits.

[smercurio_fc]

---

@altenbach wrote:

---

Darren wrote:

There's a sequence of steps you can follow that will cause a normal, mild-mannered Boolean constant to, um, get angry.

---

That clearly got lost in the first post. Since you are an NI insider, I simply figured you have a bottomless bag of tricks at your disposal and that size was intentional for some reason. 😄

---

Indeed. I thought Darren was simply expressing his artistic side.

[Darren]

---

@altenbach wrote:

That clearly got lost in the first post. Since you are an NI insider, I simply figured you have a bottomless bag of tricks at your disposal and that size was intentional for some reason. 😄

---

Come on, guys!  I program LabVIEW, just like y'all!  No bag of tricks, other than maybe walking over to a C-monkey's desk every once in a while and asking them to add a feature for me. 😉