08-08-2012 04:49 PM
Ben wrote:...
"
- c'mon Christian, show us the REAL solution that uses only 2 base functions!!! - you know you want to
You're right, but it wasn't specified overall amount used functions. My solution uses also only two base functions, but multiple times. Just created another example of "Rube Goldberg Code"
08-08-2012 06:16 PM
@SnowMule wrote:
Shouldbe easy enough to clean up with a screen thisbig.
Just use block diagram cleanup and hope for the best 😛
08-21-2012 11:05 AM - edited 08-21-2012 11:08 AM
This, this library makes me want to cry every time I open it! I was given it not so long ago, accompanied by a jovial request to "simply update this to LabVIEW 8.5 and fix any bugs you find". If you ever start to feel too relaxed, I hope this will help to reinstate your stress levels to the hights that they should normally be.
A few pictures to tickle your taste buds:
09-08-2012 04:26 PM
09-09-2012 10:19 PM
Maybe they wanted a time delay
09-12-2012 01:21 PM - edited 09-12-2012 01:22 PM
Saw this in code I am working on. I'll be able to tease the author.. LOL!
top: original
bottom non-RG
09-12-2012 01:32 PM
09-12-2012 05:20 PM
That's true.. 🙂 I RG'ed myself
09-14-2012 07:48 AM
It was probably done in one of the 5 min. updates before a demo! Or - my brain ws fried from looking at someone's "regular expressions" (why they are called "regular", sort of like "common sense", an oxymoron!)
09-18-2012 11:27 AM - edited 09-18-2012 11:27 AM
LOL!! Glad you like regEx 😄 I might be able to squeeze a few more in there.
Check your PM... I'll give you an update since last week.
Now my turn to check for Rube...
Is the following code a Rube? For some reason, I seem to think there is a better way to get a string of a 4 digit number...
Ah crap.. I just thought of it... Using a regEx, of course... I'll post the Rube code anyway..