Should Case Structures be replaced with..... Stacked Sequences!!!???!!

[SteveChandler]

---

@Ray.R wrote:

I totally agree with Christian.

But why would anyone ever want to do something silly like that?

D'euh!!  (sarcasm intended)

---

Did you see what Aristos Queue used it for that one time? But yea you do have to streach pretty far to find a good use for something like that.

[Ray.R]

OK  Curiosity is getting the best of me..  I'm gonna go read AQ's post..

I'm back...  That was not reason enough 😄

And I quote (myself):

"Well... what if the Stacked Sequence Structure was replaced with a Flat Sequence?

That would have saved you one step.  And Flat Sequences are not as nasty as their stacked cousin..."

[SteveChandler]

Yes that is a rare use for the feature. I kudoed the idea. The only real reason to keep it would be for the novelty.

[JÞB]

I thought this was another Globals are... Thanks for clarifying!

Yup a useless feature!  My next favorite useless feature is "Tools>Advanced>Create or edit express vi>New"

[Yamaeda]

---

@Ray.R wrote:

I totally agree with Christian.

The only case structure that would translate into a Stacked Sequence would be one that is indexed fromletys say 0 to n.  But why would anyone ever want to do something silly like that?  It's like taking a round wheel and making it square..!!!

D'euh!!  (sarcasm intended)

---

Guess what my inherited code looked like. Although, it was only ever supposed to perform 1 case at a time to have time to perform other tasks as to emulate some multitasking ... apparantly LV have that so you'll have to poll alot in sequence ...

/Y