The Old Brook will soon restore order to the Universe

[JackDunaway]

It's taken him a couple years (  ), but it looks like the Old Brook will soon restore order to the universe.  

[JackDunaway]

Re-reading my alfa-esque message subject caused me to both groan and LOL at the same time.

[altenbach]

I was trying to stem the tide by kudoing some more of your ideas over the weekend, but maybe it was all in vain. 😄

[JackDunaway]

---

@altenbach wrote:

I was trying to stem the tide by kudoing some more of your ideas over the weekend, but maybe it was all in vain. 😄

---

Between that and "Revoking my Kudos" from you, it might buy be another few days!

[altenbach]

(One of my problems is the fact that declined ideas can no longer gather kudos (why not?!?), else this one would probably be in four digits by now. :D)

[P@Anand]

Only top koudoed ideas will be added to the new version of LabVIEW?. I feel like that am not able to attract the users to show the significance of my IDEA. May be I can learn from the leaders

[tst]

---

@P Anand wrote:

Only top koudoed ideas will be added to the new version of LabVIEW?

---

No, the number of votes is only one factor in considering which ideas to implement. As you can see, there were popular ideas which were declined (such as the one Altenbach linked to) and there were ideas which were implemented even though they only had a relatively small number of votes.

[P@Anand]

---

@tst wrote:

---

@P Anand wrote:

Only top koudoed ideas will be added to the new version of LabVIEW?

---

No, the number of votes is only one factor in considering which ideas to implement. As you can see, there were popular ideas which were declined (such as the one Altenbach linked to) and there were ideas which were implemented even though they only had a relatively small number of votes.

---

Then I may expect that error handling option in the future LabVIEW versions. 🙂

[smercurio_fc]

---

@P Anand wrote:

---

@tst wrote:

---

@P Anand wrote:

Only top koudoed ideas will be added to the new version of LabVIEW?

---

No, the number of votes is only one factor in considering which ideas to implement. As you can see, there were popular ideas which were declined (such as the one Altenbach linked to) and there were ideas which were implemented even though they only had a relatively small number of votes.

---

Then I may expect that error handling option in the future LabVIEW versions. 🙂

---

You could always take out your tin cup and post in here: http://forums.ni.com/t5/BreakPoint/Idea-Exchange-Post-your-lonely-orphans/td-p/1174071