Why some people say Local Variables are bad...

[RobCole]

Only fly in the ointment is that Einstein was right.

An interesting article.

Rob

[JÞB]

I think maybe we should ask too look at the code Ben. Perhaps the real explanation is they have a race conditions from improper use of local variables.

[JÞB]

---

@Yamaeda wrote:

The bartender says "we dont serve your kind here".

A Neutrino walks into the bar. 

/Y 

---

A skeleton walks into a bar, looks at the bartender and says, " Hey, Bartender!  I need a beer, and a mop."

[SteveChandler]

---

@Jeff Bohrer wrote:

---

@Yamaeda wrote:

The bartender says "we dont serve your kind here".

A Neutrino walks into the bar. 

/Y 

---

A skeleton walks into a bar, looks at the bartender and says, " Hey, Bartender!  I need a beer, and a mop."

---

A variable walks into a bar.

The bartender says "are you a local"?

[Hornless.Rhino]

---

@Jeff Bohrer wrote:
I think maybe we should ask too look at the code Ben. Perhaps the real explanation is they have a race conditions from improper use of local variables.

---

Well that's gonna stuff up the Tachyonic Anti-Telephone control system.

---

@Steve Chandler wrote:

A variable walks into a bar.

The bartender says "are you a local"?

---

Gold star 🙂

[Ben]

---

@Robert Cole wrote:

Only fly in the ointment is that Einstein was right.

An interesting article.

Rob

---

That is what I love about Y'all.

Even while joking around we are on the front edge of technology.

It is like living in a virtual Levi Dockers commercial.

Ben

[JW-JnJ]

---

@Robert Cole wrote:

Only fly in the ointment is that Einstein was right.

An interesting article.

Rob

---

Pfft.

"The controversial original measurement has been blamed on a faulty fiber-optic cable connection and a malfunctioning clock, which resulted in an error of 0.00000006 seconds".

Good to know it happens to the best of us. It would have been a lot funnier if it was due to race conditions... AND if the code was posted here.

(edit) DOH, someone already said that

[Yamaeda]

---

@JW-L3CE wrote:

---

@Robert Cole wrote:

Only fly in the ointment is that Einstein was right.

An interesting article.

Rob

---

Pfft.

"The controversial original measurement has been blamed on a faulty fiber-optic cable connection and a malfunctioning clock, which resulted in an error of 0.00000006 seconds".

Good to know it happens to the best of us. It would have been a lot funnier if it was due to race conditions... AND if the code was posted here.

(edit) DOH, someone already said that

---

You were 0.00000006 seconds late. 🙂

[Hornless.Rhino]

---

@Yamaeda wrote:

---

@JW-L3CE wrote:

---

@Robert Cole wrote:

Only fly in the ointment is that Einstein was right.

An interesting article.

Rob

---

Pfft.

"The controversial original measurement has been blamed on a faulty fiber-optic cable connection and a malfunctioning clock, which resulted in an error of 0.00000006 seconds".

Good to know it happens to the best of us. It would have been a lot funnier if it was due to race conditions... AND if the code was posted here.

(edit) DOH, someone already said that

---

You were 0.00000006 seconds late. 🙂

---

In what time frame?

[smercurio_fc]

What was this thread about again? My mind is quicker to forget in these advancing years of mine.