12-22-2009 12:51 AM
12-22-2009 05:12 PM
Put another while loop over the entire code and use wait.vi with the input as 300,000 and it should work as you want
Good luck !
lab
12-22-2009 11:59 PM
12-23-2009 09:58 AM
12-25-2009 12:14 AM
No. Please,read the topic 1 post more attentively. I search for a way of start VI during time necessary to me. Simply having established a delay of it is not enough. Maybe you cant understand my question because of my English (excuse me please), so here is an example: I start the vi at 14:51:25- it should wait until 14:55:00 and only after that start the measurement! If I start the vi at 14:53:47- it should also wait until 14:55:00. It should start at 14:55:00, make full cycle and then again wait for next multiple to five time. So if I'll use only "wait until next millisecond multiple" I wont get the result I want 🙂
12-25-2009 03:13 PM
MAzayko wrote:No. Please,read the topic 1 post more attentively. I search for a way of start VI during time necessary to me. Simply having established a delay of it is not enough. Maybe you cant understand my question because of my English (excuse me please), so here is an example: I start the vi at 14:51:25- it should wait until 14:55:00 and only after that start the measurement! If I start the vi at 14:53:47- it should also wait until 14:55:00. It should start at 14:55:00, make full cycle and then again wait for next multiple to five time. So if I'll use only "wait until next millisecond multiple" I wont get the result I want 🙂
Humor me- give it a try.
the wait for next multiple with a 300,000 input will exit every time the system clock is at a 5 minute mark regaurdless of when it starts.
12-28-2009 12:54 AM - edited 12-28-2009 12:55 AM
I've tried it. It does not work.
Does anybody know how to synchronize timed loop with system time?
12-28-2009 09:32 AM
12-29-2009 02:12 AM
01-11-2010 12:46 AM