DQMH Consortium Toolkits Discussions

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

When installing DQMH just for LV2020_64b I get a missing dependency error...

Hi this is something I just found, I wonder if it has happenede to anyone before?

 

With having only LV2020_64b installed on my PC, I was getting error when installing DQMH from VIPM,

 

It reported back that I was missing dqmh_scripter.... package dependency but couldn't find it either....

 

After a while I found that you need to have LV2020_32b installed to install DQMH for 32b

get that missing dependency and be able to install it on 64b.

 

Looks like this was happening. Issue solved after installing 32b and then 64b

 

CLA, CTA
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 5
(2,056 Views)

We recently created an Azure VM that has LabVIEW and TestStand 64-bit 2020 (no 32-bit versions installed), and we didn't have an issue with installing DQMH.

Christopher Farmer

Certified LabVIEW Architect and LabVIEW Champion
DQMH Trusted Advisor
https://wiredinsoftware.com.au

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 5
(2,026 Views)

Hi LFBaute,

 

I had a similar problem when installing DQMH on LabVIEW 2020 64 bit - the main DQMH package installed OK but none of the dependencies were found.

 

I found that refreshing the list of packages manually in VIPM allowed it to find the decencies and install everything correctly.  It seems that they don't get updated correctly during the initial install for some reason.  I don't know if there's a similar problem for 32 bit LabVIEW 2020 or if this only affects the 64 bit version

 

Cheers
Brett

Senior Software Development Engineer
Certified LabVIEW Architect and LabVIEW Champion
https://theLonelyAnt.com
https://GDevConANZ.org.au


0 Kudos
Message 3 of 5
(2,019 Views)

That can explain Chris not having any issues, thanks for commenting

Ill review following your steps, Brett

 

CLA, CTA
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 5
(2,013 Views)

The same for LV2019 32-bit. Refreshed the package and it seems to find the missing packages.

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 5
(1,762 Views)