Feedback on NI Community

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Avatars

Ravens, the new avatar looks much better (new vs. old):

 

17845iA13BE192C3AD1294

0 Kudos
Message 11 of 28
(3,835 Views)

Thanks for the side by side comparison.  The new one does look a bit sharper.

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 28
(3,829 Views)

Thanks for the analisys jack.

 

I reciently updated the spinning 8 ball (and have selected my 8-ball from my image gallery).

 

Have I managed to improve the performance? Thanks


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 28
(3,767 Views)

You can tell I noticed and put my "stamp of approval" on your new avatar - it looks good, and I'm sure it performs better! I'm planning on doing a "where-are-we-now" type analysis within days/weeks to see if there's been any improvement.

 

Stay tuned...

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 28
(3,765 Views)

The change I mentioned about image hosting has taken place, but I bet it only affects images hosted by NI now that I think about it.  We'll be performing some internal performance analysis to see where the areas for improvement are.

 

Thanks,

Laura

0 Kudos
Message 15 of 28
(3,758 Views)

@Laura F. wrote:

We'll be performing some internal performance analysis to see where the areas for improvement are.


 

 

Keep in mind, your servers are already pretty darn good! From what I can tell, the lowest-hanging fruit seems to be tightening restrictions on external hosting. (This observation holds true for avatar statistics, but I would bet it holds universally true for all attachments in general.)

0 Kudos
Message 16 of 28
(3,757 Views)

I would say that blocking all external hosting is a bit harsh. I would say that if someone tries to embed an image from an external site (or maybe particular sites, such as imageshack), the forums should inform them "it's better to upload here", but it should allow them to proceed. If it didn't do that, linking to legitimate outside sources would be crippled.


___________________
Try to take over the world!
0 Kudos
Message 17 of 28
(3,752 Views)

Agreed, banning altogether would be harsh, which is why I left "tightening restrictions" a big vague. Another "warning" that needs to be included is that when linking externally, MANY forum users are subject to corporate web filtering that often sites such as "Social Networking", "Message Boards and Forums", "Downloads".... it's ridiculous what high percentage (somewhere around 50% for me) of externally hosted image attachments are blocked when I view here at work!

0 Kudos
Message 18 of 28
(3,750 Views)

 


@JackDunaway wrote:

You can tell I noticed and put my "stamp of approval" on your new avatar - it looks good, and I'm sure it performs better! I'm planning on doing a "where-are-we-now" type analysis within days/weeks to see if there's been any improvement.

 

Stay tuned...


Actually Jack, I had not seen this thread when I updated the avatar (I guess serendipity still exists).  But Thanks for the feedback and I'm glad I'm no longer on the dark lists.  I would have been disapointed to worsen performance and re-re-updated the avatar  Yeah! I like the newer one and don't feel bad about keeping it.

 


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
Message 19 of 28
(3,733 Views)

I got mine fixed as soon as I saw my name on the list.

 

I had alway expected that the avatar was too big but I though that the sysem might automatically resize the picture. I know better for next time.

Tim
GHSP
Message 20 of 28
(3,692 Views)