08-16-2005 04:59 PM
08-17-2005 01:06 AM
08-17-2005 05:18 AM
08-17-2005 07:29 AM
Hi JLV,
Take a look at LV-Pro's posting in this thread for the new form of carrot.
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=BreakPoint&message.id=318&jump=true
tst,
LV-Pro, Molly and I had a disgreement on how to pronounce your name.
Would you prefer
"Test"
or
"Tee-Ess-Tee"
or
other?
See Y'all back here after NI-Week.
Ben
08-17-2005 08:23 AM
Ben, those should be your troubles...
I can think of another option you didn't mention - how about the sound "tst" which you can make (like when you want to call someone's attention without making a lot of noise)?
As another tip - it's not an abbreviation of "test", so you can say T.S.T, although you can say whatever you like, as long as I'm not around. There is a story behind that name, but it shall not be told at the moment. Maybe NIWeek 2006?
08-17-2005 08:33 AM
08-17-2005 09:18 AM
BUGS???
In a LIST related VI?
Noooo....
08-17-2005 10:32 AM
08-17-2005 10:37 AM
tst
Thanks for your input. You deserve... and get 5 stars.
Not all people have a 235434 by 454363 screen resolution. You could make the table adapt and have a horizontal scrollbar.
I choosed to hide the horizontal scroll bar because it had a poor look (kind of a black arrow overimposed, appears in LV 7.0 and 7.1... bug ?). However, since you are sympathetic, I have added a menu item to allow the display of the H-scrollbar for the LVwers that can't afford large screens 🙂
The browser (nice touch, BTW) uses Activex, which isn't nice for non-windowers. How about using the Open URL... VI from the App Control>>Help palette (at least if the target isn't windows)?
You teached me something here. The modification has been done.
You can place all the code that's in the coloring subVI into the user event case "2" and get rid of the top loop (and the subVI). Any reason not to do that?
There is a good reason for that. I found that in some occasions, the colorize rate became very slow (up to 3 seconds, could not identify the problem, may be related to my code, not to LabVIEW). During that time, of course, the event loop was not responsive. That's why I have moved this vi in a separate loop, just to keep a "nervous" user interface.
I assume you're right and this is a bug, but the problem with coloring the cell happens when you edit the cell. The cell seems to become "unselected" only after you click in 2 other cells. You can work around this by adding a KeyFocus property set to F at the top of your property node with all the colors.
Nice to admit that there might be a bug here. Thanks for the work around : it works !
I have no idea where the flickering comes from, because that happens even when you don't do anything except selecting a cell. It happened even when I deleted almost all the code in the VI (everything except the mouse up event).
The flickering occurs even after removing all the code, and running the vi in repetitive mode. So this could be another bug (or the same...)
Three LabVIEW bugs detected in a single vi !!? I guess that could be a record. Let's report it then wait and see if somebody at NI can homologate this score...
I'll post soon the new version.
Any more comments ?
08-17-2005 10:46 AM
Unfortunately, this creates also a strong slowing down of the colorize rate. This is a way of demonstrating the role of the separate loop...
tst a écrit:
You can get rid of the flickering by having a small control (even a transparent one) over the table. This causes invalidation, according to Greg, which is apparently good for us. I posted a bug message with an example here.