FieldPoint Family

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

the switch of channel 0 of FP-RLY-422 from normaly closed to normally open influence the reading of channel 3 of FP-TC-120

I
met some problem with the temp VI which I can not solve. I used four solid state relays to connect with the fieldpoint relay FP-RLY-422 to control the heater. When the channel 0 of FP-RLY-422 swiched from "NC" to "NO"(i.e. the heater starts to heat), the temperature display of channel 3 of FP-TC-120
was influenced and the reading changes dramtically. However, when the channel 0 of FP-RLY-422 swiched back to "NC", the temperature reading of channel 3 of
FP-TC-120 display correctly. This phenomena occured only in Channel 3 or sometimes included channel 2 of FP-TC-120. Another question is is it right to
configure the initial status of the four
channels of FP-RLY-422 to be "NO"?(i.e. heater is on heating).
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(3,627 Views)
This may not answer your question exactly, but you should know that NC and NO are short for "Normally Open" and "Normally Closed". A way to think of this is what position would the relay contact be in if the relay was sitting on the bench with no power connected to it. When power is applied to the relay coil, the contact will switch from its' "Normal" position i.e. normally open will close and normally closed will open.

The initial status of the relays would depend on your application.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(3,627 Views)
I can think of two very likely possibilities to explain what you are seeing. First, make sure that the Com or C terminals of the FP-TC-120 and FP-RLY-422 module are not connected. Each modules inputs/outputs are isolated from the intermodule communication bus and thus each other. However, when two modules are cascade wired (connecting the V & C terminals from one terminal base to the next), the isolation between the modules is bypassed. If you have the FP-TC-120 and FP-RLY-422 module's commons wired together, any changes to the common potential on one module automatically effects the other, and can cause common mode noise problems. Depending upon the range setting in the FP-TC-120, the module can handle between 0.5 and 2.0 volts of common mode between channe
s. This leads us into possibility #2, Common mode noise. If one of the thermocouple wires is near some noise source, you may be inducing too much common mode voltage onto the channel and affecting the common potentials of the other thermocouples as the channels are not isolated. Things you can do to fix this problem include using shielded thermocouples, placing thermocouples that will be at different potentials on separate FP-TC-120 modules, or re-routing the thermocouple wiring away from the noise source.

As for question #2, that will depend upon your system. If the system is being controlled by an external computer and having the system powered, but the computer not on (thus the heater would turn on and stay on) could cause the chamber to overheat and be damaged, then no, it is not the correct way to wire the system.

Regards,
Aaron
LabVIEW Champion, CLA, CPI
Message 3 of 4
(3,627 Views)
The suggestion is exactly correct. Thank you very much.
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(3,627 Views)