IMAQ VI's should support all image types which makes sense

[heel]

Inconsistency is found in the supported image types for many IMAQ vi's:

For instance IMAQ ROIProfile, IMAQ LineProfile and IMAQ LinearAverages supports U8, I16 and SGL format but do not support U16 format images.

But, a profile along a line drawn in a U16 image should make as much sense as in an U8 image. Shouldn't it? So why is it not supported?

In addition, I would expect it to be easy to add an additional polymorphic U16 version.

These are just a few of several examples of similar inconsistency in IMAQ vi's.

Message Edited by heel on 03-17-2010 08:33 AM

[muks]

Support for u16...yes...

[GregSands]

While we're at it, the IMAQ VIs are terribly inconsistent in their wiring patterns - what happened to 4224 everywhere?

[muks]

I am not getting what exactly you mean by 4224..

[RavensFan]

The most commonly used connector panel for the subVI icon and the one recommended by the style guide.

Message Edited by Ravens Fan on 03-23-2010 09:21 AM

[JackDunaway]

Connector pane wiring. Common lingo includes: 4224, 5335, 4-2-2-4, 5-3-3-5, etc...

***EDIT*** (Ravens, you beat me to it! If only I hadn't cropped...)

Message Edited by JackDunaway on 03-23-2010 08:23 AM

[RavensFan]

"If only I hadn't cropped...)"

Message Edited by Ravens Fan on 03-23-2010 09:49 AM

[Darren]

Any idea that has received less than 7 kudos within 7 years after posting will be automatically declined.