LabVIEW Idea Exchange

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Marc Blumentritt

Parallel For loop

Status: Declined
Available in NI LabVIEW 2009

I read about this idea on LAVA and in fact had this idea a few years before myself: parallel For loops. Of course this does not work with every VI (only reentrant VIs) and shift registers have no function, but it would be cool to start dynamically parallel processes.

 

Regards,

Marc

CLD
15 Comments
Intaris
Proven Zealot

I had assumed that the value of P would eventually be settable at run-time instead of only compile-time.....

 

Marc Blumentritt
Member

@mfletcher: No, leave this completed. After checking, the parallel FOR loop of LV2009 is already as near to what I want, that it is suffice. Of course it would be nice, if we do not have to limit the number of workers at compile time, but this is another topic.

 

In fact, what would solve my problem much more cleaner is a better way to fork VIs, as I have posted here and others have posted about, too.

CLD
G-Money
NI Employee (retired)
Status changed to: Completed
Available in NI LabVIEW 2009
G-Money
NI Employee (retired)

I am changing the status from Completed to Declined because Completed should only be ideas that R&D see on Idea Exchange, actively developed on it based on the idea here, and it was added to the product.

G-Money
NI Employee (retired)
Status changed to: Declined
Available in NI LabVIEW 2009