Close! Notice how putting a sub-VI in there (and giving it an icon that makes it clear what it does) keeps things "neat" so the viewer can concentrate on "Is this going to lead to a proper plot?". You also posted it as a Snippet, which (a) lets the reader "see the code" right away, (b) reveals the LabVIEW Version, and (c) can be pasted into a Block Diagram for a closer look. The one (minor) hitch, of course, is that the sub-VI doesn't come with the Snippet -- if you wanted to do that, then you'd put all of your code into a LabVIEW Project, compress the Folder containing the Project, and attach the .Zip file that the compression creates.
So there is still a minor problem, naturally involving your sub-VI. I gather your sub-VI has three "left" inputs, Latitude 0, Longitude 0, and Altitude 0 (why is there a 0 in the names? Names are for your convenience, and the "0" doesn't contribute to meaning/understanding), as well as an Array input that, hmm, contains Latitude, Longitude, and Altitude (or something related). What I thought you would have done is to take the Array and use Index Array 3 times (as you did in your Teste code) to get Lat, Long, and Alt, and wire those in to XYZ Az El. Instead, you have controls that seem to "do nothing" (oops).
There is no need for Controls and Indicators except for (a) argument passing (as in XYZ Az El) or (b) interacting with Humans. Thus Lat, Long, and Alt are completely unnecessary (since your program doesn't use them). Similarly, are you really going to watch X, Y, Z, Az, and El change every half-second? Why show the numbers at all? [Note that it is fine to do this for debugging purposes, but you can debug XYZ Az El by itself -- simply open its front panel, test it by putting known values in its inputs, run it, and look at the values you get at its outputs).
One good thing to do with sub-VIs is to minimize the number of connections. One way to do this is to group related connections into an Array or a Cluster. You have a built-in Array for the Input, namely the Array of Lat, Long, and Alt (give this a name, like "GeoCoords". You could similarly have two outputs, "Cartesian" and "Polar", that could be Arrays or Clusters (you can decide on the basis of convenience, as you need to "take the data apart" to build the 3-D plots).
Bob Schor
