01-29-2010 02:12 PM
Darren wrote:I'm surprised nobody mentioned the In Place Element Structure yet...it lets you modify the array element without making any extra copies:
Still can't have the output tied back to the input array. ![]()
01-29-2010 02:16 PM
01-29-2010 02:20 PM
01-29-2010 02:37 PM
smercurio_fc wrote:
Still can't have the output tied back to the input array.
That sounded like a question a text-based programmer would ask (and that a G programmer would ask sarcastically)...my response was for the benefit of text-based programmers stumbling upon this thread someday in the future. 😉
01-29-2010 02:44 PM
Darren wrote:
smercurio_fc wrote:Still can't have the output tied back to the input array.
That sounded like a question a text-based programmer would ask (and that a G programmer would ask sarcastically)...my response was for the benefit of text-based programmers stumbling upon this thread someday in the future. 😉
Ah, but in the utopian future there will be no text-based programmers. Hey, we can dream, can't we?
02-02-2010 08:08 AM
Darren,
Thanks, this is just what I needed. Hope everyone takes a look at the structure you linked to
Darren wrote:I'm surprised nobody mentioned the In Place Element Structure yet...it lets you modify the array element without making any extra copies:
![]()
.
jvh