Auto size of table

[parthabe]

---

@chilly charly wrote:

---

parthabe a écrit: Is the Active Cell/Ccell Size property available only from LV 8.0 upwards? I didnt fid it in 7.1.

---

Both properties were already available in LV 6. Get new glasses ! :D:D:D

---

It is high time you got your eye surgery done.

[jrpe]

haha three above Cell size...what does that say?? Looks suspiciously like Active Cell to me.... eye surgery all around!

Message Edited by jrpe on 10-24-2007 10:01 AM

[parthabe]

Maybe my earlier words were incorrect [typo error] before CC's reply...

What I meant to ask was the Active Cell - Cell Font property, NOT the Cell Size property.

You can see the title I ve given to my attached pic.

[jrpe]

wow....I guess I may need eye surgery after all... I apparently can't read file names. Disregard my gloating post suggesting everyone needs eye surgery...I think ill get it first and then re-evaluate the situation. Anyway, it seems we have the same question about the cell font property. On a side note, whats with all the low ratings in this thread, I should stop replying before my average is destroyed haha

[Dennis_Knutson]

You are both looking for a property that did not exist prior to 8.x.

[parthabe]

Thank you, Sir! This is what that was expected.

Jeff, please do have a look here.

[chilly_charly]

Parthabe,

I had a good laugh when I found you were confusing "cell size" and "cell font". You earned five stars for that !

The sad thing is that a poor-minded guy thought it would be fun to distribute one-star ratings around. Laura (I know you are listening...) is there something you can do against such a personnage ? (BTW, thanks for floating the Food INdustry & LabVIEW thread !)

[parthabe]

---

@chilly charly wrote:

is there something you can do against such a personnage ?

---

I gave you the 1-star to criticise your sarcastic joke, like this one.

[chilly_charly]

---

parthabe a écrit: ... I gave you the 1-star to criticise your sarcastic joke, like this one. 🙂

---

Can't see what you mean, since your link point to :

Anyway, there was nothing sarcastic in my reply, just a friendly joke, clearly identified (I suppose you didn't miss the attached smiley ?).

While I feel insulted by the anonymous single star rating, that cannot be confused with a simple joke !

I believe that my friendly attitude on this forum do not deserve such an agression. You should read the comments about single-star ratings here.

Message Edité par chilly charly le 10-25-2007 09:07 AM

[parthabe]

In my browser [English IE7], it points to the correct page, E-list page 21, Ray Farmer's reply to you.

Maybe yours is different, so the difference.

I know all about that 1-star stuff thread, I ve been thro' it many a time either, time & again...