05-21-2012 08:22 PM
I am using Labview 8.6. My programmer left awhile back. We use the code for testing of power amps. We were using a LNA to GPIB modem interface (EET) as the interface between the computer and the test gear. The modem died, and we purchased another GPIB interface modem. This was a GPIB USB modem. The computer can talk to each piece of gear individually through the modem. However, when we run the program, the program hangs on the first direction to a piece of test gear. The error comes back that the piece of equipment is not the primary controller. Can anyone help me? I am interested in a longer term arrangement to upgrade our code once this issue is solved.
05-22-2012 08:11 AM
They are not "modems". These are adapters.
Why didn't you buy another LAN to GPIB adapter?
There is probably addressing in the software that was changed when you went with the different adapter.
05-22-2012 11:59 AM
@SDEddie wrote:
I am using Labview 8.6. My programmer left awhile back. We use the code for testing of power amps. We were using a LNA to GPIB modem interface (EET) as the interface between the computer and the test gear. The modem died, and we purchased another GPIB interface modem. This was a GPIB USB modem. The computer can talk to each piece of gear individually through the modem. However, when we run the program, the program hangs on the first direction to a piece of test gear. The error comes back that the piece of equipment is not the primary controller. Can anyone help me? I am interested in a longer term arrangement to upgrade our code once this issue is solved.
The EULA for this web-site restricts me from advertising my service.
It does NOT restrict me from agreeing with Saverio that the addrress may now have changed since the adapter is different.
The EULA also does not restrict me from inviting you to click on that link in my signature to see what my company does.
Ben
05-22-2012 12:05 PM
@Ben wrote:
@SDEddie wrote:
I am using Labview 8.6. My programmer left awhile back. We use the code for testing of power amps. We were using a LNA to GPIB modem interface (EET) as the interface between the computer and the test gear. The modem died, and we purchased another GPIB interface modem. This was a GPIB USB modem. The computer can talk to each piece of gear individually through the modem. However, when we run the program, the program hangs on the first direction to a piece of test gear. The error comes back that the piece of equipment is not the primary controller. Can anyone help me? I am interested in a longer term arrangement to upgrade our code once this issue is solved.
The EULA for this web-site restricts me from advertising my service.
It does NOT restrict me from agreeing with
Saverionyc that the addrress may now have changed since the adapter is different.
The EULA also does not restrict me from inviting you to click on that link in my signature to see what my company does.
Ben
There, I fixed that for you, Ben.
Now that I've been invoked I will add this: my suspicion is that the original coder may have hard-coded the interface and/or addresses.
05-22-2012 12:08 PM
@smercurio_fc wrote:
@Ben wrote:
@SDEddie wrote:
I am using Labview 8.6. My programmer left awhile back. We use the code for testing of power amps. We were using a LNA to GPIB modem interface (EET) as the interface between the computer and the test gear. The modem died, and we purchased another GPIB interface modem. This was a GPIB USB modem. The computer can talk to each piece of gear individually through the modem. However, when we run the program, the program hangs on the first direction to a piece of test gear. The error comes back that the piece of equipment is not the primary controller. Can anyone help me? I am interested in a longer term arrangement to upgrade our code once this issue is solved.
The EULA for this web-site restricts me from advertising my service.
It does NOT restrict me from agreeing with
Saverionyc that the addrress may now have changed since the adapter is different.
The EULA also does not restrict me from inviting you to click on that link in my signature to see what my company does.
Ben
There, I fixed that for you, Ben.
Now that I've been invoked I will add this: my suspicion is that the original coder may have hard-coded the interface and/or addresses.
All of you non-avatared contributors look the same to me.
But thank you,
Ben