@X. wrote:
Is this a behavior (the one I described as "expected") that might fly in the Idea Exchange, or is there some philosophical dogma preventing this to be even considered?
"Value" refers to the datatype value of the control, which is different than other characteristics of the control. It might be useful to have new datatypes that were (as Darin mentioned) a more dynamic way of having a set of something than an enum. But I'm not sure there is all that much value to extending "default value" to all characteristics, given that there is already a ctrl-Z undo system and the ability to revert VIs. What use cases do you see?
