Ok,
I ran the IMAQ dispose test last night, unfortunately it doesn't stop the
machine from crashing. Upgrading to LabView 6 is not an option either, LabView
5.1f1 is expicitly specified in the functional specification (and my customer
isn't prepared to fork out 1000 pounds for a bug fix). Is it possible to
use an ActiveX control to simulate the animation frames (i.e. program the
animation in VB and then use it to create an ActiveX control, and place the
activeX control in LabView)? Would this get around the problem, and if it
would, does anyone know if such a control has already been made?
Thanks,
Ben
"Ben" wrote:
>>That is the advice NI gave me,> but it didn't make much difference unfortunately,
it simply took longer>to crash. And to be honest, I can't see it being a
problem with the graphics>drivers really, I've tried it on 3 different machines
with an ATi Rage Light>8Mb graphics card, a Matrox MGA-100, and an Nvidia
TNT2 M64. If it crashes>with all 3, then surely it can't be the graphics
drivers?>Ben>>>"Jean-Pierre Drolet" wrote:>>You
can speed up the tests removing the 50 ms wait and feed few copies of>the>picture
ring. To test if it is a video driver problem, set your display>driver>to
plain old generic VGA, which is very stable, and test the VI. If>it does>not
crash, it is a video driver problem.>>Jean-Pierre Drolet>>>"Ben" >a
�crit dans le message news:>39dc8769@newsgroups.ni.com...>>>> Thanks for>the
advice,>> I'm trying to use the IMAQ dispose option right now, although>it
usually>> takes several hours to crash, so I won't know whether it works>or
not>until>> tommorow.>> As for my program itself, it is simply a picture>Ring
control, inside a>> for loop, connected to the index (to cycle through>the
sequence), which is>> itself inside a While loop so I can turn it off.>There
is a Wait until>Next>> Multiple set to 50 mS inside the For Loop. Not>exactly
complex, which is>> why I couldn't understand why it kept crashing.>>>Ben>>