06-26-2008 11:01 AM
06-27-2008 11:19 AM
06-28-2008 09:10 AM
06-30-2008 08:10 AM
07-01-2008 09:25 AM
07-07-2008 06:12 PM
Hi Pramod,
You might be better off leaving the data in the waveform type, so that the timebase information isn't lost. Some of the prior examples we handled the waveform types, you might want to use techniques similar to methods we tried earlier. I would recommend using the convert from dynamic datatype with the wveform type selected and then correct the rest of the code to use those datatypes.
Let me know if you can't figure out how to handle the waveform types. Maybe we can break down your ultimate goal and then re-work your code to fit your needs.
07-10-2008 07:01 AM
07-11-2008 11:22 AM
Hi Pramod,
Here is an example that should fix your issue with the x-scale. If you have more questions let me know.
Also, you might find the LabVIEW training classes beneficial. They will teach you methods for manipulating data in LabVIEW and commonly used programming practices. If you have any questions about the training you can look here:
http://www.ni.com/training/labview.htm
07-11-2008 11:38 AM - edited 07-11-2008 11:40 AM
07-15-2008 01:31 PM
Hi Mark
Thank you for your reply. Now I am getting the 330Hz frequency using this code.
I have attached the LabView code. But I am not able to divide the x-scale value
by number of blades i.e 11. I can do this by multiplying the x-scale
value. Is there any other way to do this?