05-08-2017 07:10 PM
Hi,
Can someone guide me to performing this process.
I been sitting on it for 10 hrs and couldn't come up with a solution.
Current test steps is using the OSCILASCOPE TEKTRONICS TDS2024B
Stave Channel BITE A1B1
180 BITE A1B1 Stave 1 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.327 Vrms
181 BITE A1B1 Stave 2 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.334 Vrms
182 BITE A1B1 Stave 3 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
183 BITE A1B1 Stave 4 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.285 Vrms
184 BITE A1B1 Stave 5 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
185 BITE A1B1 Stave 7 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.320 Vrms
186 BITE A1B1 Stave 8 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.332 Vrms
187 BITE A1B1 Stave 9 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
188 BITE A1B1 Stave 13 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.317 Vrms
189 BITE A1B1 Stave 14 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
190 BITE A1B1 Stave 15 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
191 BITE A1B1 Stave 16 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.323 Vrms
192 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.406 Vrms
193 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Phase -1.380 1.380 0.013 usec
194 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
195 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.681 usec
196 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
197 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.956 usec
198 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.330 Vrms
199 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.555 usec
DESIRED TEST STEPS using the HP 3561A Dynamic Signal Analyzer
Stave Channel BITE A1B1
180 BITE A1B1 Stave 1 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.327 Vrms
181 BITE A1B1 Stave 2 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.334 Vrms
182 BITE A1B1 Stave 3 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
183 BITE A1B1 Stave 4 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.285 Vrms
184 BITE A1B1 Stave 5 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
192 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.406 Vrms
185 BITE A1B1 Stave 7 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.320 Vrms
186 BITE A1B1 Stave 8 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.332 Vrms
187 BITE A1B1 Stave 9 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
196 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
194 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
198 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.330 Vrms
188 BITE A1B1 Stave 13 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.317 Vrms
189 BITE A1B1 Stave 14 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
190 BITE A1B1 Stave 15 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
191 BITE A1B1 Stave 16 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.323 Vrms
(Use OSCILASCOPE TEKTRONICS TDS2024B here)
193 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Phase -1.380 1.380 0.013 usec
195 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.681 usec
197 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.956 usec
199 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.555 usec
the reason for change is because of the equipment. the Dynamic Analyzer is more accurate when it comes to finding out the amplitude but it cannot check the phase. So I have to go back and forth with the two equipment.
All the equipmetns are working. Just the order that its in is not.
I am thinking of removing everything and do a flat sequence but I am not sure if it will take a long time. I might have to because Its the only way I know how to do it for now.
05-08-2017 07:10 PM
Hi,
Can someone guide me to performing this process.
I been sitting on it for 10 hrs and couldn't come up with a solution.
Current test steps is using the OSCILASCOPE TEKTRONICS TDS2024B
Stave Channel BITE A1B1
180 BITE A1B1 Stave 1 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.327 Vrms
181 BITE A1B1 Stave 2 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.334 Vrms
182 BITE A1B1 Stave 3 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
183 BITE A1B1 Stave 4 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.285 Vrms
184 BITE A1B1 Stave 5 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
185 BITE A1B1 Stave 7 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.320 Vrms
186 BITE A1B1 Stave 8 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.332 Vrms
187 BITE A1B1 Stave 9 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
188 BITE A1B1 Stave 13 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.317 Vrms
189 BITE A1B1 Stave 14 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
190 BITE A1B1 Stave 15 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
191 BITE A1B1 Stave 16 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.323 Vrms
192 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.406 Vrms
193 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Phase -1.380 1.380 0.013 usec
194 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
195 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.681 usec
196 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
197 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.956 usec
198 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.330 Vrms
199 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.555 usec
DESIRED TEST STEPS using the HP 3561A Dynamic Signal Analyzer
Stave Channel BITE A1B1
180 BITE A1B1 Stave 1 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.327 Vrms
181 BITE A1B1 Stave 2 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.334 Vrms
182 BITE A1B1 Stave 3 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
183 BITE A1B1 Stave 4 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.285 Vrms
184 BITE A1B1 Stave 5 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
192 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.406 Vrms
185 BITE A1B1 Stave 7 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.320 Vrms
186 BITE A1B1 Stave 8 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.332 Vrms
187 BITE A1B1 Stave 9 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
196 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
194 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.318 Vrms
198 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.330 Vrms
188 BITE A1B1 Stave 13 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.317 Vrms
189 BITE A1B1 Stave 14 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.319 Vrms
190 BITE A1B1 Stave 15 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.321 Vrms
191 BITE A1B1 Stave 16 Amplitude 1.100 1.500 1.323 Vrms
(Use OSCILASCOPE TEKTRONICS TDS2024B here)
193 BITE A1B1 Stave 6 Phase -1.380 1.380 0.013 usec
195 BITE A1B1 Stave 11 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.681 usec
197 BITE A1B1 Stave 10 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.956 usec
199 BITE A1B1 Stave 12 Phase -1.380 1.380 -0.555 usec
the reason for change is because of the equipment. the Dynamic Analyzer is more accurate when it comes to finding out the amplitude but it cannot check the phase. So I have to go back and forth with the two equipment.
All the equipmetns are working. Just the order that its in is not.
I am thinking of removing everything and do a flat sequence but I am not sure if it will take a long time. I might have to because Its the only way I know how to do it for now.
05-08-2017 07:35 PM
What version of LabVIEW is that?
You might want to look into state machines for the future development. A much better plan then using the flat case structures. Especially given the way that all the files are already reasonably well setup for state machine architecture.
05-08-2017 07:42 PM
I am using labview 7 😞
05-09-2017 02:36 AM
Hmm, pink error wires looks like it's upgraded/based on LV 5, so i don't know if this tips will work.
You can add a new case after the others, then r-click the case structure and Shift case to e.g. 8, assuming each case is one row of the test sequence.
If that's not possible, you'll need to manually add to the case numbers so you create space for the test steps.
/Y
05-09-2017 04:37 AM
05-09-2017 09:40 AM - edited 05-09-2017 09:41 AM
A state machine is the right call, but that generally implies an architecture where you use a shift register so that the results of one state are used to determine what the next state should be, and that new state is passed back to the beginning of the loop through a shift register.
It looks like you have more of a "scripted" state machine. Create a cluster that contains an enum that defines the state (such as the text name you have in your table.) Also numeric elements like where you define your parameters such as 1.1 and 1.5 Create an array and drop that cluster in.
Define your table using 1 element of the array for each step for the enum and parameters. Save that as a constant on the diagram. Do the same thing for the other order of conditions. Since most of the list is the same, just copy the original array constant once created, then delete and add rows as necessary to create the new order of steps.
Now instead of relying on the i terminal and a meaningless numeric driving the case structure, auto-index on the array coming into the loop. Unbundle to get the enum to drive the case structure and to get the numeric parameters used in that step.