LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Formatting a timestamp into string with $ specifier

Formatting a timestamp into string with $ specifier does not work; the formatted string is empty and no error is reported:

 

19061iB67D59F74C86F953

 

I have forced the width to 10 to show that the format is at least partially scanned but when it is omitted the timestamp field is empty.

I couldn't find this problem reported/addressed so here it is (LabVIEW 8.6)

 



LabVIEW, C'est LabVIEW

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 9
(4,400 Views)

Ohhhh... Snippets!!! Code Capture Tool is a must. Congrats!

 

19073iEAD4C0EB70CD4DA3



LabVIEW, C'est LabVIEW

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 9
(4,389 Views)

Maybe it means that time isn't money?


___________________
Try to take over the world!
Message 3 of 9
(4,383 Views)

Also, I forgot to say that I can confirm this in 2009.

 

And, you may wish to have a look at the about dialog of the CCT. 😉


___________________
Try to take over the world!
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 9
(4,377 Views)

I just ran into this issue with 2014.  Did we ever get a CAR for this?


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 9
(4,089 Views)

Ok looking at the format string, the expected output of the code would be "FILE2014-09-19-SN42.txt"

 

Instead we get "FILE          -SN42.txt"

 

I did a quick search on CARs and found nothing specifically addressing this issue although some similar CARs were filed. I will raise this problem with our LabVIEW developers and see if we should file a CAR on it. However, I don't know how high of a priority a fix would be since there are easy workarounds for this.

 

Thanks,

Daniel C.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
0 Kudos
Message 6 of 9
(4,058 Views)

 

 

I have a work around for this if anyone needs it badly I can share.

 

I use it to make human readable timestamp for putting into a text file.

 

Might not be in the format you wish for but it will give something.

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 9
(4,045 Views)

""there are easy workarounds for this."""  Ahh there you go.

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 9
(4,044 Views)

Yes, the simple work around is to put the timestamp first in both the string and the inputs.  But this is a bug.  There is no doubt about that.  A high priority?  Probably not.  Something that should be looked for when doing a revamp of the Format String?  Yep.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 9 of 9
(4,025 Views)