LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

In Port.vi / Out Port.vi

Hi,

as I was using LabView 4.0 the use of �In Port.vi'/'Out Port.vi' was not
working. It was a common problem so National Instruments provided a
patch for that LabView version, which fixes that problem (accessHW.zip).
Is it still necessary to use that patch, if I am using Labview 5.0 or
higher?

Bye,

Alexander


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(5,962 Views)
There is no need for a LabVIEW patch in order to perform port I/O under
operating systems that permit it, such as Windows 95. The accessHW.zip
example is an example of how you can use the a special kernel-mode driver
with the LabWindows/CVI run-time engine in order to achieve port I/O on
Windows NT, a system that restricts access to memory-mapped devices.

So, if you're looking to do port I/O under NT without using a kernel-mode
driver provided by the hardware manufacturer, you'll need the accessHW.zip
download, or something like it. You shouldn't need any special LabVIEW
patch, regardless of version.

Best Regards,
John Lum
National Instruments

Alexander Salim wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as I was using LabView 4.0 the use of �In Port.vi'/'Out Port.vi' was not
> working. It was
a common problem so National Instruments provided a
> patch for that LabView version, which fixes that problem (accessHW.zip).
> Is it still necessary to use that patch, if I am using Labview 5.0 or
> higher?
>
> Bye,
>
> Alexander
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(5,962 Views)
I will ftp it to you, or you can get it from me, it's called AccessHW_5.
Email me on Monday and we can sort it out (haven't got time to sort out
my ftp prog right now)

regards,

Seb

--
Sebastian James
IRC in Superconductivity
Madingley Road
Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK
work: +44 (0)1223 337040
home: +44 (0)1223 526107
fax: +44 (0)1223 337074
email: ssj20@cam.ac.uk
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(5,962 Views)