LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LabVIEW QMH shipping template cannot build in LabVIEW 2023 Q1.

Hi.

 

Last week I was teaching a group of people about some of the most commonly used design pattern in LabVIEW. I have done this before but this was the first time using LabVIEW 2023 Q1.

To my surprise the build specification for the "Main Application" which is part of the template could not build. The Application Builder stopped with an error 1055. As I mentioned I have used this template many times before over the years and it has never failed before. So I went back and tried on LabVIEW 2019 SP1 and LabVIEW 2022 Q3. The exact same code could build on these two versions, but still not in 2023 Q1.

 

I have attached a screen shot of the "Create Project" dialog to make sure everyone knows which template I am talking about.

 

The error messages I get is:

Error 1055 occurred at Property Node in VISL_findDependentVISvr.vi->VISL_findAndProcessVISvrList.vi->VISL_detectAndCopyVISvr.vi->AB_Engine_Copy_CustomIOServer_Files.vi->AB_EXE.lvclass:Copy_Files.vi->AB_Build.lvclass:Build.vi->AB_Application.lvclass:Build.vi->AB_EXE.lvclass:Build.vi->AB_Engine_Build.vi->AB_Build_Invoke.vi->AB_Build_Invoke.vi.ProxyCaller

Possible reason(s):

LabVIEW: (Hex 0x41F) Object reference is invalid.

 

So can anyone perhaps help verify my discovery and perhaps someone from NI could try it too. To me it looks like it potentially could be a bug in the Application Builder. Or if some breaking changes was made to the Application Builder it might be that something needs to be update in the shipping template.

 

Thanks.

Best regards
Jens Christian Andersen.
CLA, CTA, CPI
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(813 Views)

Same exact error on code built on prior platforms no error.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(654 Views)

Builds fine for me...

Screenshot 2023-07-12 140509.png

 

Screenshot 2023-07-12 140607.png

 

 

========================
=== Engineer Ambiguously ===
========================
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(638 Views)