LabVIEW
LabVIEW
@Darkhann ha scritto:
You could politely say that the screen is not visible, that it is blurred, why fly in so fast?
off-topic:
There are a lot of low effort posts on this forum, the regular posters here expect users to put some effort in for the effort they do replying. Therefore sometimes the tone can be quite passive aggressive.
I understand them, but I also believe that we need to help new LabVIEW users learn and keep using it. I also don't like the tone here sometimes and I hope both the new and veteran users can keep the community positive, There aren't that many LabVIEW users to begin with!
On-topic
Here is the block diagram for the example. Convert the point(s) into complex numbers so LabVIEW can automatically convert it into polar coordinates. Then simply filter the points that are in range.
@Basjong53 wrote:
Here is the block diagram for the example. Convert the point(s) into complex numbers so LabVIEW can automatically convert it into polar coordinates. Then simply filter the points that are in range.
That's not quite the same and I only used two in range? operations. Here is what your code does:
Here is my code, but I seriously doubt it is what the OP needs, see below!
@Basjong53 wrote:
There are a lot of low effort posts on this forum, the regular posters here expect users to put some effort in for the effort they do replying. Therefore sometimes the tone can be quite passive aggressive.
At this point the OP has not even given the full problem description as asked many times.
Nobody can work with a requirements document that just says "The point falls into the specified area. HELP ME BUILD A GRAPH, YOU CAN SEND ME A SCREENSHOT AND AN ANSWER." (sic)
- Maybe finding one point that is inside the shaded area is sufficient?
- What should happen with all the other points? (discard?)
- Should we keep generating random points until we have 100 that are inside the shaded area?
- What should the graph show? Do we need the circle and axis decorations, for example? (maybe use a picture indicator!)
- Maybe they already have all the code to generate the data inside the undecipherable formula node and the question is just about building a graph (which they already do!)
- There is a broken wire because a scalar (instead of a 2D array!) is wired to an intensity graph terminal. Maybe they need help with just that? (QUOTE: "help he build a graph")
- etc.
@altenbach wrote:
There is a broken wire because a scalar (instead of a 2D array!) is wired to an intensity graph terminal. Maybe they need help with just that? (QUOTE: "help he build a graph")
Here's how displaying my data on an intensity graph could be done:
@altenbach ha scritto:
@Basjong53 wrote:
Here is the block diagram for the example. Convert the point(s) into complex numbers so LabVIEW can automatically convert it into polar coordinates. Then simply filter the points that are in range.
That's not quite the same and I only used two in range? operations. Here is what your code does:
You're picture was too blurred for me to replicate it exactly... Not sure how you got the above graph though, here's what I get when I run my code.
@Basjong53 wrote:
You're picture was too blurred for me to replicate it exactly... Not sure how you got the above graph though, here's what I get when I run my code.
Ah yes, you are doing a rectangular grid instead of random points. I don't have LabVIEW 2021 and my browser is set to scale the forum at 80% so I could not really tell what's in your first loop (I guessed "r,theta to complex"). 😄
.png){kind=link}
