Naming Timed Loops in Re-entrant VIs

[Michael_78]

i will tty again tomorrow and see if the issue is still present in 2011.

Thanks

michael

[P@Anand]

Am not in a position to test enything now so please do one more test. Run the timed loop at 1ms and keep a sub vi inside which takes 2ms and create different instance and run it. If this is also working without any issue then I don't have any problem in using that in clone.

[JÞB]

I was curious enough to tempt fate:

There are both clones spinning nicely without issue in 2011

[nathand]

---

@P Anand wrote:
Am not in a position to test enything now so please do one more test. Run the timed loop at 1ms and keep a sub vi inside which takes 2ms and create different instance and run it. If this is also working without any issue then I don't have any problem in using that in clone.

---

Why is this useful?  Are you thinking the subVI should be reentrant, or not?  I changed my test code so the loop runs at 1ms with a 2ms wait inside, no problems:

Note the L954013 at the top left of the timed loop - that's the loop name about which the question was originally asked.

[tyk007]

From the answers shown here it appears as if the Structure Name is not required for the simple use of a timed loop in a re-entrant VI - thanks for your help.