08-18-2006 03:38 PM
08-28-2006 04:19 PM
08-28-2006 04:37 PM
In that case, how about setting up a thread just for Windows Mobile feature requests after v8.2 ships? I can suggest many features that are needed.
Thanks
Robert
08-28-2006 04:48 PM
08-30-2006 05:56 PM
08-31-2006 10:32 AM
08-31-2006 11:01 AM
@rberger wrote:
Hi Trager, how you doin?The Treo 650 was/is a great smartphone that really increased Palm OS market share. Now the next generation of Treo's come out (Treo 700 series) and one of them has Windows Mobile! Makes me wonder why Palm hardware people sold their soul to the devil?
Thanks Robert for the very informative post.
YIKES!!!! That is horrible if Palm OS goes away. To be replaced by more Windoze stuff (I won't start...).
Just as I'm starting to explore NI-Palm apps, I read this.. -sigh -
😞
08-31-2006 11:19 AM
Hi Robert and Trager,
You both bring up several good points. NI R&D has spent a lot of time and energy since the inception of the PDA Module making sure that it is truly supported on both OS platforms. This impacts not only our software development process, but also other areas like documentation. Supporting both platforms often meant fewer new features and bug fixes due to resource constraints.
At the same time, the handheld market is clearly moving to Windows Mobile (including Palm devices). This is reflected in the make up of our PDA Module customers, who overwhelmingly favor devices running Windows Mobile. However, NI will continue to monitor market share trends in the PDA market and if something changes dramatically, we will reevaluate our decision on OS support. More than anything, NI wants to make sure that we are responsive to customer needs.
Thanks to both of you for your feedback on this issue.
Mike N.
LabVIEW Product Manager
08-31-2006 01:33 PM
Hey Robert, good to 'see' you again. Doing well, we should catch up offline sometime.
I understand NI's logic, seeing how many more windows-based PDAs are out there. My interest was specifically with the smartphone segment, and excepting perhaps the Motorola Q (which I've heard mixed reviews about), the Palm OS smartphones are generally MUCH better received than the windows mobile ones. Even with the relatively minor upgrade that the 700p was, most reviews of the Treo 700w that I've read admit that the 650 was a much better product, and by extension, so is the 700p (although there are relatively few direct comparisons since the 700p was not out at the time of the 700w release). In addition, there have been rumors floating around the PDA world for quite some time that Palm is on the verge of closing down the Palm OS group and replacing the current Palm OS with a Linux-based version; so that may be another factor.
I suspect that the majority of users who wish to use PDAs for mobile data acquisition are using WinMobile devices, for several reasons. The primary one is the Windoze familiarity, with the "superior" hardware spec (note that I put that in quotes because WinMobile implementations tend to use a lot more resources than their Palm equivalents) running a close second. The 64K limit that you mention is a definite third.
I am disappointed myself, because I feel that there may be an untapped market for using LV for general (i.e. non-DAQ-centric) application development for devices like the Treo 650/700p. In general, the licensing requirements for LV-Palm have made that cost-prohibitive, but I've been talking with some other Palm OS developers and with the widespread proliferation of the 650 and sites like PalmGear and Handango, I think it might be viable. One of the big problems with writing utility programs for the Palm OS has been the relatively slow speed of writing good code, and we all know how LV helps in that regard. In addition, honestly, an experienced LV programmer has a MUCH better grasp of UI principles than the average Palm developer, it seems. Unfortunately, just as I've come to that conclusion and have the time to do something about it, NI pulls the Palm version of the dev kit
08-31-2006 05:02 PM