I think it is because when you manipulate the slider, there is
discretization of values introduded by the integer number of pixels on which
you can drop the slider.
Jean-Pierre Drolet
Scientech R&D
"Henrik Skupin" a écrit dans le message news:
3AA7A9E0.11FF0649@web.de...
> Ok, it's not that function!
> I set the Range from the actual value of a slider. If I type the value
> in the digital box, all is ok. But when i take the slider and move it,
> the described differences occur? Did somebody know that problem?
>
> Henrik
>
>
>
> Henrik Skupin schrieb:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > i just want to use the function above to check my slider control if the
> > value is inside the selected range. I need that cause i can change the
> > minimum and m
aximum with another control. When i use the function i wire
> > all needed data to the terminals and receive also a result. But it's not
> > the same, also when the value was inside the range. After any updates i
> > get differences <0.2.
> > Here an simple example:
> >
> > 1) before: -20 0 30
> > after: -10 0.06 40
> >
> > 2) before: -10 0.06 40
> > after: 0 0.03 50
> >
> > And when i want's to select 0 again, it changes back automatic to 0.08!?
> > What happens and where can I prevent this behavior? Or occurs it by
> > changing the range?
> >
> > Regards
> > Henrik