11-30-2006 04:52 AM
11-30-2006 05:02 AM
12-12-2006 08:47 AM
It's not clear why type definitions will cause a coersion. I appreciate your response and I'll fix the type def issue. Sorry for the long reply. I was on vacation.
Thanks,
Dave J.
12-12-2006 02:54 PM - edited 12-12-2006 02:54 PM
The coercion dot is ther to bring to your attention that that LV has done some guessing about how the data in one typedef matches up with the other.
Contrary to popular belief, not all coercion dots are a sign of a data copy or duplication. They are a sign that there MAY be a data copy.
Ben
Message Edited by Ben on 12-12-2006 02:54 PM
12-13-2006 07:43 AM
After I wrote and posted
"
Contrary to popular belief, not all coercion dots are a sign of a data copy or duplication. They are a sign that there MAY be a data copy.
"
it occured to me that I should include a warning to those that have not passed the CLAD or CLD exams. In that case, froget what I said. ![]()
Ben