06-11-2012 04:44 AM
06-11-2012 04:55 AM
Iam getting \\n only when Iam attaching \n with constant(FF)
Everything else is working as expected: the strings sent by your WriterVI are received by the ReaderVI and displayed in receiving order..
But how it is??It is not working as expected.Still displaying in reverse order.
06-11-2012 06:21 AM
Can't able to find why "\\" is coming.Is it due to this problem Iam getting unexpected results??
06-11-2012 06:31 AM - edited 06-11-2012 06:33 AM
First, I'm impressed by GerdW still helping you. You where told to go through the tutorials, and you agreed on doing so. But still you are asking question about a very simple program. And you are asking basic questions that has already been answered in this tread.
Go through this tread and if you can find the answer to you own question, it is there.
06-11-2012 06:34 AM
06-11-2012 06:41 AM
Hi,
How are the constant been viewed ? \-code or normal ?I can't found out this thread
The difference between LF characters and normal characters I understand.Will you please run this attachment.Please point out the exact problem area.I will do it myself
06-11-2012 06:48 AM
Hi Danil,
why do you close the COM port two times? To be sure it's getting closed???
You have been told a lot of times about the importance of the correct display mode for strings. Still you fail in setting your strings to the correct display format. You already spotted the critical point in one of your last messages. Why don't you check this again?
DKFire told you what to check, you already know where to check - so what's your problem now?
"Will you please run this attachment."
As I told you before I don't have two COM ports available, so cannot run your VIs.
Do you ever read any messages here?
06-11-2012 06:55 AM
Yes I really did.
Actually I asked you many times that I failed to find out why \\n is coming?And the array2 is not showing that.Iam asking 'one' and you are asking another one.
06-11-2012 07:00 AM
Hi Danil,
take your VI from message#176, read what DKfire wrote in message#174 and look at the spot you already found in message#170.
What is your problem - apart from not being able to combine facts you already have been told?
06-11-2012 07:04 AM
Yes,I removed that one.I have given that one according to your instruction in #146.![]()