String functions with array input - processing array of stings one function call

[AdarshaPakala]

Thank you all for your reply. 

I will leave this thread open, if anyone has other thoughts, please add here.

Thank you

Adarsh

CLA from 2014

[thols]

ideas:

* See if you can get the array in a binary format

* See if you can get the array in a better formatted string

* Let us see what you are trying to format and see if we can improve the speed

[Yamaeda]

Can you post some example of data and your current code?

[Frozen]

---

@thols wrote:

ideas:

* See if you can get the array in a binary format

* See if you can get the array in a better formatted string

* Let us see what you are trying to format and see if we can improve the speed

---

* see if you can reduce the number of strings generated

[BertMcMahan]

Couple people mentioned it already but you didn't reply to it so I'm not sure if you saw it. Have you tried this:

https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA03q000000x3QZCAY&l=en-US

[AdarshaPakala]

ideas:

* See if you can get the array in a binary format

* See if you can get the array in a better formatted string

* Let us see what you are trying to format and see if we can improve the speed

Thank you for your reply. Can you please share more details on this ?

Regards,

Adarsh

CLA from 2014

[AdarshaPakala]

Couple people mentioned it already but you didn't reply to it so I'm not sure if you saw it. Have you tried this:

https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA03q000000x3QZCAY&l=en-US

Thank you for your reply.

I have seen this, but in the loop i have to take data converting decision based on the information in the previous packs. What does that mean is, i have shift the information extracted from earlier iterations to the upcoming iteration to data convert. How can we achieve this parallel loop? Any thoughts?

Best regards

Adarsh

CLA from 2014

[pincpanter]

---

@AdarshaPakala  ha scritto:

Couple people mentioned it already but you didn't reply to it so I'm not sure if you saw it. Have you tried this:

https://knowledge.ni.com/KnowledgeArticleDetails?id=kA03q000000x3QZCAY&l=en-US

Thank you for your reply.

I have seen this, but in the loop i have to take data converting decision based on the information in the previous packs. What does that mean is, i have shift the information extracted from earlier iterations to the upcoming iteration to data convert. How can we achieve this parallel loop? Any thoughts?

Best regards

Adarsh

CLA from 2014

---

Then you seem to be doomed. Maybe you can buy an extremely powerful (and expensive) computer.

Since you did not provide the details of your processing, nobody can help you to improve it, if possible at all.

[GerdW]

Hi Adarsha,

---

@AdarshaPakala wrote:

ideas:

* See if you can get the array in a binary format

* See if you can get the array in a better formatted string

* Let us see what you are trying to format and see if we can improve the speed

Thank you for your reply. Can you please share more details on this ?

---

To share more details you should provide an example VI with some example data - as has been requested so many times before…

---

@AdarshaPakala wrote:

in the loop i have to take data converting decision based on the information in the previous packs. What does that mean is, i have shift the information extracted from earlier iterations to the upcoming iteration to data convert. How can we achieve this parallel loop? Any thoughts?

---

Thoughts: provide an example VI with some example data to explain your conversion algorithm.

It definitely does NOT help when you provide information in tiny bits after days and weeks…

[AdarshaPakala]

I'm very sorry, due to the privacy issue i can’t explain the parsing protocol.

I can't mimic the conversion complexity in a sample data and code without explaining the parsing logic.

It is my limitation.

Thank you all for the contribution.