Table (strict) vs. Table

[MaSta]

Hello!

In this board I found a nice VI that auto-sizes the columns of a table. Being called as sub VI, it uses a ref. Nothing special, except for one thing: the class used in the sub VI is strict.

When I put this sub VI into my VI, which I also use as sub VI I will also use a ref. So I place an empty property node 

and assign the class 

, but as you can see only the common class is available and strict is grayed out. 

Question: how could the other person create the strict property node and how can I solve this? My best guess is to replace all the strict nodes by common nodes.

[MaSta · Accepted solution]

A colleague told me that you can change the type definition for a control to strict. If I do that for a table control, it's not clear if that would be recorded by LV so that it now offers the strict classes in the VI assignment. 

However, the solution was to replace the ref by a common class one.