LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

[Useless Code Corner] Wires Length

Sooo, fellow LV Programmers, have you ever encountered textual language programmer, who measures "hard work" he's doing by number of lines of code? From now on, you can answer this by telling him how many wires you've laid!

 

https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-28317

 

With this code you can easily calculate, how much your clients pay per meter of wire! I think this will be revolution in evaluating applications value 😄

 

Fun fact: to calculate length of wires in this project, I had to use 2.68 meters of wires. One of my commercial projects have about 260 m.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 17
(4,000 Views)

Yep - http://lavag.org/topic/8001-wireometer/

 

I actually do remember writing the code to do this at some point. I think I still have it, although I can't say it's needed now that you posted yours.

 

Actually, I probably couldn't say it was needed before either. 😉

 

 

Also -

 

http://lavag.org/topic/6448-measuring-diagrams-in-acres-hectares-and-unit-icons/

 

http://lavag.org/topic/6308-calculate-vi-modularity-index/


___________________
Try to take over the world!
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 17
(3,988 Views)

Can it also calculate inductance and capacitive cross talk between the wires?

 

Cheers

Edgar

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 17
(3,959 Views)

@ejkaiser wrote:

Can it also calculate inductance and capacitive cross talk between the wires?

 

Cheers

Edgar


Or loss of signal strength? Synchronization of signals by equal wire length? What is the speed of signals on a wire (which might create synchronization issues)?

 

Norbert

Norbert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 17
(3,957 Views)

Those are in the add-on toolkit. When released it will cost 100 times as much as the original VIs.

 

Lynn

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 17
(3,922 Views)

Yeah, I'll also add electromagnetic compatibility testing in future versions 😄

 

I like to think that errors in my codes are actually signals induced from other wires, not just my faults 😄

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 17
(3,898 Views)
I shudder to think what would happen if some Software QA or Program Manager whose never actually used LabVIEW should get a hold of this thread. Integration testing would have to start having a bit leakage paramenter,.....and the temperature testing to make sure the wires don't shrink over temp becoming disconnected. What about workmanship? Did we have the wire connections inspected? LOL
Wire Warrior

Behold the power of LabVIEW as my army of Roomba minions streaks across the floor!
0 Kudos
Message 7 of 17
(3,871 Views)

@Wire_Warrior wrote:
I shudder to think what would happen if some Software QA or Program Manager whose never actually used LabVIEW should get a hold of this thread. Integration testing would have to start having a bit leakage paramenter,.....and the temperature testing to make sure the wires don't shrink over temp becoming disconnected. What about workmanship? Did we have the wire connections inspected? LOL

That reminds me of an email I have floating around about a QA asking a bunch of questions of a vacuum chamber.  The best part is "how do you know pockets of the vacuum aren't leaking into the room".  Now I have to find it.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 8 of 17
(3,866 Views)

@PiDi wrote:

Yeah, I'll also add electromagnetic compatibility testing in future versions 😄

 

I like to think that errors in my codes are actually signals induced from other wires, not just my faults 😄


Maybe twisted pair wires will help to reduce the errors.  😉

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
Message 9 of 17
(3,856 Views)

@billko wrote:

@PiDi wrote:

Yeah, I'll also add electromagnetic compatibility testing in future versions 😄

 

I like to think that errors in my codes are actually signals induced from other wires, not just my faults 😄


Maybe twisted pair wires will help to reduce the errors.  😉


I always make sure mine are differential, not single ended.

Message 10 of 17
(3,853 Views)