05-08-2017 09:01 AM
05-08-2017 09:03 AM - edited 05-08-2017 09:09 AM
What would I fill in the false case then? I can't have nothing in there
Edit:
Got it! I don't have to go through the case 😄
Thanks for your help and patience 😄
05-08-2017 09:06 AM
05-08-2017 09:12 AM
It's monday for everyone :s
I just come back here too fast instead of thinking twice (or three times).
However I still failed with my time stamp, the string doesn't work with the array. And converting it to double like the rest of the data gives again a big number.
But that's not a big issue, I don't think it really needs a time stamp.
05-08-2017 09:14 AM - edited 05-08-2017 09:15 AM
Hi XebeXUC,
However I still failed with my time stamp, the string doesn't work with the array. And converting it to double like the rest of the data gives again a big number.
Hint: when converting the timestamp to a DBL number fails you might convert your measurement values to strings and use an array of strings…
05-08-2017 09:56 AM
Oh yeah, that worked great, only negative side is that I seem to be losing digits, but the sensors are probably not even that sensitive so rough numbers should be good enough.
05-08-2017 10:10 AM
05-08-2017 10:13 AM
@XebeXUC wrote:
It's monday for everyone :s
I just come back here too fast instead of thinking twice (or three times).
However I still failed with my time stamp, the string doesn't work with the array. And converting it to double like the rest of the data gives again a big number.
But that's not a big issue, I don't think it really needs a time stamp.
try Time to XL.vi
Excel an LabVIEW use different "Epochs"
WARNING Time constants do not travel well adjust that constant for your timezone
05-09-2017 06:39 AM - edited 05-09-2017 06:49 AM
Basically digits after the comma/point.
So 1,9 becomes 2...
But thanks for the tip, I found a better one indeed.
Edit: apperently it isn't that much better :S
05-09-2017 07:27 AM
Hi Xebe,
Basically digits after the comma/point. So 1,9 becomes 2...
Using FormatIntoString with a format of %f will give you "1.9"…
But thanks for the tip, I found a better one indeed.
Which one?
Edit: apperently it isn't that much better
Well, which one isn't better?