LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

crc32 of a binary file

Hi,

Can someone please let me know how I would go about getting a crc32 checksum in labview of a binary file?

Thanks & Regards,

Don1.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 18
(5,133 Views)
This is not a new question in this forum. Do a search for crc32. You will find many hits. Remember some are quite old. Check the date and year before posting 😉


Besides which, my opinion is that Express VIs Carthage must be destroyed deleted
(Sorry no Labview "brag list" so far)
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 18
(5,129 Views)
Have you tried a search? That would have taken all of five seconds to enter in the search bar.
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 18
(5,128 Views)

Telling a user to search is not useful. And looks especially dumb when it is on a google result. Just don’t post if yo don’t provide an answer.

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 18
(3,539 Views)

@Jandy wrote:

Telling a user to search is not useful. And looks especially dumb when it is on a google result. Just don’t post if yo don’t provide an answer.


How is that not useful? If they search they'll find the answer with the minimum amount of effort. What looks dumb to me is replying to a nine-year-old thread to complain about encouraging searching before posting.

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 18
(3,534 Views)

Telling a user to search is not useful. And looks bad when it appears on a google result. Please don’t post if you don’t provide an answer.

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 18
(3,527 Views)

@Jandy wrote:

Telling a user to search is not useful. And looks bad when it appears on a google result. Please don’t post if you don’t provide an answer.


Okay, let's put this bluntly.  When someone expects someone else to do the legwork they should have done before - i.e., use Google first - you tell them to do that first, because that's what you did to find the answer.

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 7 of 18
(3,515 Views)

@Jandy wrote:

Telling a user to search is not useful. And looks bad when it appears on a google result. Please don’t post if you don’t provide an answer.


Oh, and did you find the answer by Googling?  (Better say, "no!")

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 8 of 18
(3,512 Views)

What is the purpose of the CRC32? Just validation?

 

Why not use MD5? There's an OOTB VI for getting a file's MD5... Not technically a CRC, but probably works even better.

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 18
(3,493 Views)

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

Why not use MD5? There's an OOTB VI for getting a file's MD5... Not technically a CRC, but probably works even better.


In my experience, they work the same as long as your file stays under 4GB (the limit of the CRC32 before getting a repeat answer).  It would be interesting to do a performance comparison...


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 10 of 18
(3,491 Views)