01-12-2018 01:15 AM
01-12-2018 01:19 AM
Hi GerdW
i have save data in graph as default data
thanks a lot
regards
khalid
01-12-2018 01:44 AM - edited 01-12-2018 01:52 AM
Hi khalid,
that's what I expected before:
- Your signals seems to be very noise.
- When zooming in you see some "spikes" on both signals - at exactly the same samples/time…
So I would conclude: there is no delay…
Again I repeat my question: What is the EXPECTED delay between both signals?
This is what I had in mind when I made the suggestion to crosscorrelate two signals:
(I faked the signal using a function from signal generation palette.)
01-12-2018 02:40 AM
the two lasers are 2 mm apart , so i assume that there has to be time delay between the signals ,so from the peak of Rxy function i can get the delay between the two signals
01-12-2018 03:13 AM
I know nothing about your used measuring principle, but what I see from the zoomed-in-graph Gerd posted (first graph in post 13) you have a sample rate of 100 kHz (five datapoints between major ticks). This is a cycle time of 10^-5 s.
The delay for a light signal with a velocity of aprox. 3*10^6 m/s is for a distance of 0,002m around 6,67 * 10^-10 s. This is far away from your sampling time.
Could this be the reason, that there is no delay to see?