05-21-2008 04:10 PM - edited 05-21-2008 04:11 PM

05-21-2008 04:31 PM - edited 05-21-2008 04:35 PM
Dennis,
I can understand wb2nvy's confusion. When I originally ran the vi it looked like the index was moving the data higher and higher into the array. When in fact the new data is being pushed to index 0 of the existing array, but since the data looks the same, it gives the illusion as it is being indexed incorrectly. Your suggestion of changing the value removes this illusionJ
On a side note I thought maybe he was looking to split the array at an odd point. This would leave the array in two pieces that are different sizes. Then I started thinking how do you make this re-shape properly? And I came up with the attached solution.
*How do you get the png to appear;)
Regards,
-SS
05-21-2008 11:49 PM - edited 05-21-2008 11:54 PM
ShotSimon wrote:
*How do you get the png to appear;)
05-22-2008 06:46 AM
05-22-2008 06:57 AM
05-22-2008 07:06 AM
05-22-2008 07:45 AM
05-22-2008 09:12 AM
index 0..n-1 specifies the point in the array at which you want to insert the element, row, column, page, and so on. You can wire only one index input. For example, to insert a 1D array as the fourth row of a 2D array, wire 3 to the first index input, and the second index input becomes disabled. To insert the array as the fourth column of the 2D array, wire 3 to the second index input, and the first index input becomes disabled.How much more clear than that can you be? It also would be redundant to say that you can't insert into a column that doesn't exist, because ... it doesn't exist! That action is undefined.
05-22-2008 09:33 AM
05-22-2008 09:40 AM - edited 05-22-2008 09:41 AM
