01-21-2003 03:22 PM
01-21-2003 05:16 PM
03-04-2003 07:20 AM
07-05-2003 11:56 AM
07-26-2013 10:06 AM
I only have the LabView Base development package, is there any way for me to make an easy work-around for finding the correlation coefficient or will I have to implement the equation?
07-26-2013 01:32 PM
Implementing the equation seems like an easy workaround. 😄
07-26-2013 02:46 PM
I know this thread is ten years old but I'm still going to post the subVI i made, it will work even for those with the base development package. Hope this proves useful for somebody out there.
07-26-2013 03:01 PM
Hi gbaby,
yes, the thread is VERY old.
10 years later the function palettes have changed a lot and now contains functions like that (atleast in FDS)...
07-26-2013 03:05 PM
I only have the basic development package, trust me I know that the Full and Professiona have all kinds of toys built in that I have to either build myself or find in decade-old threads. I just posted mine in case somebody is in my situation. ![]()
07-26-2013 03:18 PM - edited 07-26-2013 03:34 PM
@gbaby wrote:
I know this thread is ten years old but I'm still going to post the subVI i made, it will work even for those with the base development package. Hope this proves useful for somebody out there.
Thanks! Actually, looks very similar to the one posted by greg over 10 years ago. 😮
You can eliminate the FOR loops (might perform better by taking better advantage of SSE). After the FOR loops are removed, there are a few common sub-expressions that you can merge for even better performance. No big deal, though. 😉