04-03-2008 06:24 PM
04-03-2008 07:20 PM - edited 04-03-2008 07:20 PM

04-04-2008 06:19 AM
04-04-2008 06:33 AM
See here... there is nothing wrong about this function. You only need to know how it works ! Sometimes it is the way to go, sometimes other solutions may be better.
tinnitus a écrit:
now i don't see when a wait until next can be usefull, or only if code takes 2 times less than loop cycle
04-04-2008 11:27 AM
For some other discussion about "wait next ms multiple", also have a look at the following thread:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=291455&query.id=41686#M291455