Michael Munroe wrote:
> You may want to have another look at how you create your XML data.
> Your example is not valid XML and cannot be parsed with
> any of the standard tools.
>
Ok, make it
and it is valid XML.
A real XML-Parser must be able to read this.
> The normal format for a numeric indicator would be:
>
> Voltage Limit
> 5.00000
>
>
> If use the standard XML palette "flatten to XML" to write a cluster to
> a file, you can wire the same cluster into the unflatten from XML to
> restore the data. You will have to strip the first line from the
> file, since it contains a header that unflatten cannot process.
Cool... This is good, when you're writing XML-file only with labview
and
read it again with labview! Or if you're creating other applications in
a way, that they write "LabView-Compliant" XML.
I understand the X in XML als "eXtensible". The XML-Support in LabView
isn't extensible in such a way. There are some good sub-vis in the
XML-Vis, but its just for exactly the XML-Format used by NI .-(
LabXML is an option, but it's using external code which is bound to a
Microsoft-Platform.
My own XML-vis are adapted to my program, but i think they can be
extended. So, if someone is interested, i could put them up for download
(in LV 4.1-format).
Bye
Marco